Upon contact with direct fire, what two options does the Unit Leader have?

When a unit encounters direct fire, the primary options available to the Unit Leader include "Assault or Break Contact." This choice is critical because it reflects the immediate tactical decisions that must be made when facing enemy fire.

Choosing to "assault" means the unit will actively engage the enemy to either eliminate the threat or gain a more advantageous position. This approach can be effective if the unit has sufficient strength, momentum, or tactical surprise. It embodies an aggressive posture aimed at neutralizing the enemy.

On the other hand, "breaking contact" is the alternative option, which involves disengaging from the enemy and repositioning to a safer location. This might be necessary if the unit assesses that their risk is too high or if they do not have adequate resources to continue the fight effectively. Breaking contact allows the unit to preserve its forces and regroup for a more effective strategy later on.

In essence, this answer encapsulates two fundamental tactical responses to direct fire, emphasizing the need for a clear strategic approach in high-pressure situations. The other options do not align as directly with the immediate decisions made under direct fire and therefore do not adequately address the urgency of the situation faced by the unit leader.